All eTECHreport (ISSN 1551-1103) articles written by Tom Wishon unless otherwise noted. Please refrain from unauthorized reproduction of text, photos, and/or graphics.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Common Sense Clubfitting and Shotmaking Accuracy Expanded Myths Book Manuscript Complete As a Clubmaker, What ARE You Selling? The Latest and Greatest "Pearls" from the TWGT
Clubmaker Forum |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Common Sense Clubfitting and Shotmaking Accuracy
When it comes to improving shot accuracy for golfers through clubfitting, only those fitting specifications which can affect/correct/offset mistakes in the golfer’s swing path, on-center hit percentage and delivery of the face to impact are pertinent. Of all the 23 different golf club specifications, following are the ones which if changed, can bring about a visible improvement in the golfer’s accuracy. Most Effect on Accuracy (A Effect Fitting Specs) - Lie Angle (More for the Irons, Wedges and Putter than the
Woods) Important, But Less Pronounced Effect on Accuracy (B Effect Fitting Specs) - Face Progression/Offset Through Common Sense Clubfitting, first focusing on the three fitting specs which will have the Most Effect on Accuracy (A Effect Specs) will bring about the most dramatic accuracy improvement for the golfer. While none of the Less Pronounced Effect specifications (B Effect Specs) on their own can bring about as much of a change as the A Effect Specs, in combination the B Effect specifications can deliver a solid improvement in shot accuracy for some golfers. A. EFFECT FITTING SPECIFICATIONS FOR ACCURACY IMPROVEMENT Lie Angle ( Irons, Wedges and Putter) • The greater the loft of the clubhead or the smaller the target for the shot, the more important it is to fit the Lie Angle correctly to the golfer’s actual swing/stroke. Lie angle must be fit dynamically for the irons and wedges to take all swing and shaft bending factors into account to ensure the center of the sole is the point of contact with the ground during the shot. Lie can be fit statically for the putter.
Face Angle (Woods only, sometimes Hybrids) • No question, Face Angle is the number one most influential fitting specification for improving the accuracy of the shot. It earns this distinction because at a carry distance of 200 yards, each degree of Face Angle change brings about a 5 to 6 yard difference in the sideways misdirection movement of the shot. Because hybrid clubheads do have a wider sole than conventional irons, it is possible for hybrid heads to be fit for Face Angle as well.
Length (effect is greater with Woods than Irons) • The shorter the length of the club, the less pronounced a golfer’s tendency will be to swing over the top and generate an outside/in swing path. A change in length is not nearly as effective for golfers who hook the ball because of a deep inside/out swing path, but reducing length is a strong way to combine with Face Angle (and offset) to help a golfer reduce a slice.
B. EFFECT FITTING SPECIFICATIONS FOR ACCURACY IMPROVEMENT Face Progression/Offset • For golfers who slice the ball, changing to an offset driver/woods can allow the golfer just a little more chance to continue rotating the clubface back around to be less open at impact. In combination with Face Angle, an offset driver/woods can definitely reduce a golfer’s degree of slicing shot curvature. Do realize the effect is more pronounced in the woods than in the irons. Clubhead Center of Gravity Location • When the clubhead’s CG is located on the heel side of face center, or can be moved such through a heel side headweight movement of >30 grams , a slight reduction in the tendency to fade the ball is achieved. Key words here are slight and fade. When the golfer slices the ball, Face Angle, Length and Offset become the key fitting parameters. A heel located CG is something to think about only for golfers who wish to reduce a tendency to fade the ball, or to turn a straight shot into more of a gentle draw. Clubhead Moment of Inertia About the Shaft Centerline • The farther the clubhead’s CG is away from the shaft, the more tendency for a golfer to leave the face slightly more open at impact to result in a fade or an increase in the tendency to fade the ball. Here again, this effect is slight and in no way will a longer heel to toe head size be a major reason that a golfer may slice the ball. This is only a fitting factor for golfers who wish to reduce a slight tendency to fade the ball with the driver, for golfers who hit the ball straight and wish to see a slight draw on their ball flight with the driver, AND, who are acceptable to a change to a smaller size driver head. Golfers with these desires and tendencies who wish to play a large driver head are advised to think about a heel located CG. Shaft Weight (Total Weight) • Shaft Weight is the number one way to control the total weight of the club. Playing with a total weight (shaft weight) that is too light for a golfer of great physical strength and/or fast/forceful downswing tempo/transition can make the tendency to slice/fade the ball or pull the ball worse. At the same token, playing with a total weight that is much too heavy can increase the tendency to push the ball. Shaft Torque (Woods far more than Irons) • It’s almost hardly worth mentioning this fitting parameter with respect to shot Accuracy because so few shafts are made today with a high enough torque to ever be a problem. Golfers with a very fast/forceful downswing tempo/transition should not play with shafts that have >4 to 5 or more degrees of torque. In short, the more fast/forceful the downswing tempo/transition, the more the torque has to be chosen to be lower than 4°. Grip Size • Grip comfort can be a key element in developing a consistent release of the wrist-cock angle for some golfers, but not all. The best rule of thumb is simply to fit all golfers with the grip size that promotes the most relaxation of the hand and arm muscles in the swing. Set Makeup • Off-center hits bring more mis-direction to the shot. Set Makeup can affect shot Accuracy simply by replacing clubs which the golfer has far more tendency to hit off-center with clubs that fly the same distance but are easier to hit solid and on-center a higher percentage of the time. Swingweight (Or Moment of Inertia of the Assembled Club) • As with the total weight, when swingweight/MOI of the assembled club is too light for the golfer’s downswing tempo/transition, there is more of a tendency to swing over the top with an outside/in swing path. In turn, this typically results in more off center hits and/or a greater outside/in path for a worse pull or slice/fade. Swingweight/MOI too high for the golfer typically means more of a tendency to push the ball. By focusing on the A Effect Specifications first, but watching all of the B Effect Specs as well, Clubmakers can have a very visible effect on any golfer’s ability to improve their shotmaking Accuracy. ______________________________________________________________________________ Expanded Myths Book Manuscript Complete
Come April 2008, the ideal book to convince golfers that professional custom fitting is far superior to buying standard made clubs off the rack will be on all major bookstore shelves. Tom Wishon’s latest book, A Good Club Spoiled: Equipment Myths That Could Wreck Your Golf Game, is now written and in the hands of the publisher for layout and printing in preparation for its debut from all major booksellers for the spring of 2008. Based on the 32-page booklet, 12 Myths That Could Wreck Your Golf Game, the expanded Myths book will be just over 100 pages in length, and written so each myth will be easy for ‘attention challenged’ golfers to be interested enough to read. From our standpoint at TWGT, more copies in the hands of more golfers is what it’s all about. We know the more golfers who see and read our Search and 12 Myths books, the more golfers end up contacting a custom clubmaker in their area to be custom fit. So TWGT welcomes the change of the first Search book into softcover form. “In lieu of a big consumer marketing budget, which we don’t have, the future of professional custom clubmaking lies in how many golfers we can get to discover the equipment truths in the consumer books we have been writing,” said TWGT president and book author Tom Wishon. “We realize in today’s fast paced world of the internet, not nearly as many people take the time to sit down and read multi-hundred page books,” Tom continued. “When the publisher of our search books came to me this summer and said all of the major US booksellers loved the concept of our little 32-page 12 Myths promotional booklet but wanted it expanded to 100 pages, I was thrilled that we might have hit on the ideal book format to attract more golfers to read and learn why custom fitting is so much better for their equipment dollars than continuing to buy the standard made clubs off the rack. There is no question when golfers read the facts of clubfitting in our books, a very high percentage realize their equipment needs are far better handled by custom Clubmakers.” TWGT wants to thank all the Clubmakers who contributed ideas through the thread on the TWGT Clubmaker Forum for new Myths to be included in the book. While we could not include every suggestion, we did choose a lot of the new myths presented and factualized in the book from the contributions of the Clubmakers. Following is a list of the golf equipment myths included in the new book, A Good Club Spoiled: Equipment Myths That Could Wreck Your Golf Game. I. CLUBHEADS 1. Modern golf clubs hit the ball farther than the older ones. II. SHAFTS 13. You are using stiff shafts (or any other flex) in your
clubs. It says so right on them. III. THE ASSEMBLED CLUB 19. The longer the length of the club, the farther you’ll
hit the ball. IV. FITTING 26. I was “custom fitted” at the driving range
(or retail golf store, or pro shop). V. GRIPS & GOLF BALLS 29. If you slice the ball, use smaller size grips; if you
hook the ball, use larger. VII. SPECIAL POPULATIONS 31. Women’s clubs are designed for women. VIII. THE GOLF INDUSTRY 35. My clubs are just like the ones the pros use. IX. AND THE MOTHER OF ALL MYTHS! 37. I am not a good enough golfer to be custom fitted—besides,
it’s not the arrow, it’s the archer.
______________________________________________________________________________ As a Clubmaker, What
ARE You Selling? In the two years since TWGT introduced its Search series of books aimed at telling regular golfers the truths about golf equipment, a very obvious point has surfaced which clearly spells the difference between the Clubmakers who have been able to grow and increase their fitting business and those who have not. Plain and simple, the Clubmakers who are enjoying an increase in their business make it a point to sell the golfer on the benefits of professional custom fitting. The Clubmakers who are not experiencing an increase in business are still trying to focus on selling golf clubs to golfers. Don’t understand? No question, when the golfer hands
over their credit card or signs the check, they do walk out
the door with golf clubs. The difference is that for the Clubmakers
who are increasing their business, the sale all starts and is
all focused on the fact that what the golfer is buying is a
professional custom fitting session which results in a set of
golf clubs that the golfer knows will perform and play better
for him/her than any standard made set of golf clubs carrying
a well known, heavily marketed brand name. Successful custom Clubmakers SELL THE FIT as being far better than buying a set of brand name, standard made clubs off the rack. Struggling Clubmakers lose their differentiation by continuing to debate the benefits and quality of golf clubs with a brand name unknown to the golfer vs. clubs which carry a name with which the golfer is completely familiar. Just about every clubmaker who tries to tell a golfer that the clubs he/she can build are as good as or better than the heavily marketed brand name clubs is fighting a very steep, uphill battle. Brand marketing is designed to convince consumers that the brand name means the best product quality. In the case of the golf industry, several of the big golf club companies spend upwards of $50 MILLION each year to indelibly burn this point into the minds of consumer golfers. No matter how technically proficient you may be at debating
the merits of the clubs you build, you cannot win that debate
with 98+% of the golfers you encounter because $50 million times
year after year is too difficult for you to upstage. You might
as well be trying to build cars in your workshop and try to
tell everyone you make a better car than Ford, Toyota or Mercedes-Benz. On the other hand, the giant clubmaking companies and their $50 million/year in marketing DO have an Achilles’ Heel. The weakness of every big golf club company that IS being exploited and exposed with real success by a handful of astute Clubmakers is their practice of doing nothing but selling standard made, one size fits all, golf clubs off the racks of every pro shop, retail golf store or internet golf retail site. If you want to be successful in growing your business as a custom clubmaker, everything you say or do has to be aimed at making the golfer realize that no matter how good they believe the brand name clubs to be, there is no way they can possibly achieve all they can be as a golfer unless they take the time to be professionally custom fit. This is precisely what the Search books and 12 Myths booklets are designed to do – but they need your follow up conversation with each golfer to drive home the clear point that as long as golfers are all different and all make swing mistakes, no standard made set of clubs can ever perform as well for the golfer as a set that is custom fit to each golfer’s individual size, strength, athletic ability and swing characteristics. Sell the FIT FIRST and the sale of the golf clubs will easily follow. ______________________________________________________________________________ The Latest and Greatest "Pearls" from the TWGT Clubmaker Forum Following are just a few of the more recent subject threads from the TWGT Forum. My brother just bought a new Titleist Vokey Spin Milled 58 degree wedge and that thing spins like crazy. I was wondering what the difference between the Wishon CX Micro and Spin Milled are. Are they practically the same grooves? I was just curious. Welcome to our Forum and thanks for your question. To my knowledge, while both the CX Micro and Vokey Spin Milled wedges have a CNC milling on the face, the Vokeys have conventional scorelines while the CX Micros have scorelines that are more narrow but closer together. Vokeys and virtually all other wedges have scorelines that are 0.8mm wide and 2.8mm spaced apart. The CX Micro scorelines are 0.6mm wide and 2.0mm spaced apart. What this means is that at impact, the Vokeys put the edges of THREE scorelines on the surface of the ball while the CX Micros put the edges of FIVE scorelines on the surface of the ball. Backspin is a product of 1) swing speed, 2) friction between the face and the ball. The higher the swing speed, the more backspin will result. This is a function of the golfer, period. The more friction between the face and surface of the ball, the more backspin will result. Friction is a product of 1) surface roughness, 2) sharpness of the edges of the scorelines, 3) the golfer’s angle of attack with the clubhead down into the ball. SO, if you mill the face, you increase the friction between the ball and the flat areas between the scorelines. If you make the scorelines so that you have more line edges in contact with the ball, you increase the friction. And if you hit down and through the ball strongly, you also get more friction. So the Vokey milling and the CX Micro milling do the same thing. But the Vokey’s conventional scorelines don’t add as much more friction to the impact as do the smaller and closer together CX scorelines. Of the two, face roughness and scorelines, the face roughness will account for the majority of the spin because the area of the face between lines is greater than the area of the line edges. But having more line edges in contact with the ball does add some more spin to the shot. Bottom line, the Vokey’s spin the ball more than any wedge that has a conventionally sand blasted or glass bead blasted face surface between scorelines. But the CX Micros spin the ball a little more than the Vokey’s or any other wedge because they have both the surface roughness from the CNC Milling and the closer together scorelines to put more line edges in contact with the ball. Both the Vokeys and the CX Micros are USGA Conforming.
What is the difference between the carbon steel alloys of 1020 and 1035 when it comes to quality and carbon steel make up? I had the question asked to me. Virtually nothing. In the nomenclature of the AISI (American Iron and Steel Institute) the first two numbers “10” always means the alloy is a carbon steel. The last two numbers dictate the percentage of Carbon in the steel. So 1020 means a carbon steel with 0.2% C in the composition, while 1035 means a carbon steel with 0.35% C in the composition. The higher the % of C in the carbon steel, the harder and less bendable it will be in relation to ones with lower % of C. In golf club performance this means nothing. In manufacturing, it means that very slightly less force is required in the forging to hammer a 1020 into the desired shape. About the only thing that would show up would be that after a year of play, a set made from 1020 would be dinged more on the surface than a set made from 1035, and if the golfer hit a lot of balls from mats or hardpan, he’s be wise to have the lofts and lies re-checked a little more often. But in terms of performance, feel, etc, NO DIFFERENCE whatsoever that any human being could ever perceive.
I am just curious what others think/know about the effect of backspin on sidespin, or, more specifically, EFFECTIVE sidespin (i.e. how crooked yo’ ball goes). I’ve heard opinions ranging from “more backspin means more time in the air which gives the ball more time to curve with the sidespin it was hit with” to “more backspin assists in steering and holds the ball online despite still having appreciable sidespin”. I am especially pondering this since my 919 wants to go so dang straight, and appears to have a little more backspin than other TWish designs I have played. Wonder if that’s a big reason, along with the hefty MOI. Maybe the fact that you can’t see the results of sidespin as much on a 9 iron as on a 4 iron explains it all...not sure? There is no such thing as sidespin. There is only backspin and how much the axis of backspin rotation has been tilted to the right or left from the golfer’s delivery of the face to impact with the ball.While there are launch monitors which output a number for sidespin, this to us is not a “real world” situation and really tells us nothing. Since obtaining our Trackman launch monitor, which does read backspin in a number of degrees that the spin axis is tilted, this makes a whole lot more sense in the proper analysis of shot data. Off line curving shots result when the axis of backspin rotation is tilted to the right (slice for RH golfer) or left (hook for RH golfer). In a slight fade or hook for example, the tilt is in the order of 4 to 8 degrees. In an outright slice or hook, you’re looking at a tilt of the backspin axis to something in the area of 30+ degrees. We’re talking driver heads here by the way.
______________________________________________________________________________
All eTECHreport (ISSN 1551-1103) articles written by Tom Wishon unless otherwise noted. Please refrain from unauthorized reproduction of text, photos, and/or graphics.
|
|
Irons/Wedges
| Woods
| Putters
| Aldila
| Grafalloy
| UST
| Fujikura
| True
Temper | Winn
Golf Pride | Putter Grips | Juniors | Tools | How To | Fitting Services | Catalogue | TWGT Section |